A prominent US-based Muslim group, the Muslim Advocacy Council (MAC), has called on Congress to cancel the scheduled address of the Indian Prime Minister to the joint session of the United States Congress.
MAC argues that hosting the Indian leader would imply endorsement of the policies and actions that they claim have targeted and marginalized Muslims in India.
MAC’s request is based on concerns regarding the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in India, which critics argue discriminates against Muslims.
They also cite the revocation of Article 370, which granted special status to the Muslim-majority region of Jammu and Kashmir, as a reason for their demand.
The Muslim community within the United States has expressed deep reservations about the alleged human rights abuses in India and sees the invitation to the Indian Prime Minister as an opportunity to voice their concerns.
Supporters argue that cancelling the address would send a strong message against the erosion of minority rights in India.
The controversy has sparked a polarized debate among lawmakers, with some supporting the MAC’s request, emphasizing the need to address human rights issues.
Others argue that hosting the Indian Prime Minister allows for dialogue and diplomacy.
Congress now faces the challenging task of navigating these competing interests and determining the most appropriate course of action.
While the fate of the Indian Prime Minister’s address remains uncertain, the MAC’s demand has succeeded in raising awareness about the concerns of the US Muslim community and has sparked broader discussions about religious freedom and human rights on an international scale.
