Mass Convictions in Tunisia’s ‘Conspiracy Case 2’ Raise Concerns Over Rule of Law

Mass Convictions in Tunisia’s ‘Conspiracy Case 2’ Raise Concerns Over Rule of Law
———————————
Tunisia’s recent mass conviction of opposition figures in the so-called “Conspiracy Case 2” has drawn sharp criticism from Amnesty International, highlighting ongoing restrictions on civic space and erosion of judicial independence, Amnesty International reported. The case involves vague terrorism and state security charges widely viewed as politically motivated efforts to silence dissent and intimidate critics of President Kais Saied’s government.

The trial, which began on 24 June 2025 and concluded on 8 July, resulted in convictions of 21 out of 24 defendants, including senior members of the Ennahdha party, former officials, lawyers, and opposition members. Sentences ranged from 12 to 35 years. Ennahdha leader Rached Ghannouchi was sentenced in absentia to 14 years after refusing to participate.

The charges stemmed from allegations of a covert network aiming to change the state structure, based largely on anonymous testimonies, intercepted communications, and political criticism dating back over a decade. Amnesty International condemned the trial for serious due process violations, including remote video participation that limited defense rights and restricted courtroom access for journalists and observers.

Since President Saied’s power consolidation in 2021, Tunisia has seen increased executive interference in the judiciary and a crackdown on opposition figures, journalists, and activists. Amnesty International called for the sentences to be quashed, the immediate release of those detained for peaceful dissent, and restoration of judicial independence and fair trial standards in line with Tunisia’s human rights obligations.